- Monday, April 2 at Noon in Room 170
- Monday, April 2 at 4:50p.m. in Room 125
- Tuesday, April 3 at Noon in Room 410
- Wednesday, April 4 at 4:50p.m. in Room 180
Friday, March 30, 2012
Lexis - Cost Effective Searching Class
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Public Domain Citation in CO
Monday, March 26, 2012
Writing Tip of the Week: Writing the Summary of the Argument
Placement. In an appellate brief, the Summary comes after the Statement of the Case and before the Argument section. In a motion brief, the Summary, or “Introduction,” comes before the Statement of the Case.
Content. According to Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8), the Summary “must contain a succinct, clear, and accurate statement of the arguments made in the body of the brief.” Although the Summary provides a roadmap of your argument, it is different from the overview paragraph because it is a stand-alone section of the brief. It covers the main arguments addressed in your point headings, but should not merely repeat them. Try to strike a balance between the detail in the argument section and the more condensed point headings.
Length. The summary should not be overly long—one to two pages at most. Typically, that means one paragraph per issue (and perhaps an introductory paragraph if there is more than one issue). Although you need not give equal weight to each argument, the Summary should follow the same order as your argument section.
Citations. The Summary should center on the arguments themselves. Therefore, although you may sometimes need to reference a key statute or controlling case to make your Summary understandable, you will not usually include citations.
Robin Wellford Slocum, Legal Reasoning, Writing, and Persuasive Argument 480-83 (2d ed. 2006); Laurel Currie Oates & Anne Enquist, The Legal Writing Handbook 361-62 (5th ed. 2010).
Changes to Accessing Databases Off-Campus
Friday, March 23, 2012
Colorado Legal Research Class
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
HeinOnline Law Journal Library
Monday, March 19, 2012
Electronic Citation Guide
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Income Tax Deadline
Written by Sheila Green, Reference Librarian
Monday, March 12, 2012
Writing Tip of the Week: Imply and Infer
Writers sometimes mistakenly use the word “infer” when they really mean “imply.” Although the two words are related, they are used differently. To imply means to suggest or express indirectly. To infer means to deduce, conclude, or assume.
Thus, use imply when the actor is sending an indirect message; use infer when the actor is receiving, or drawing inferences from, someone else’s message. The person who implies something is the sender of the message, whereas the person who infers something is the recipient of the message.
- The detective implied (suggested) that the defendant was guilty by testifying, “He ran when he saw me, didn’t he?”
- The detective inferred (deduced or concluded) from the defendant’s demeanor that he was hiding something.
- During the settlement negotiations, the plaintiff’s lawyer implied (suggested) that his client would consider a lesser settlement if the defendant publicly apologized.
- When the victim filed a civil suit, the defendant’s counsel inferred (deduced or concluded) that the victim was no longer committed to pursuing criminal charges.
For further information, see Anne Enquist & Laurel Currie Oates, Just Writing 310 (3d ed. 2009) and Laurel Currie Oates & Anne Enquist, The Legal Writing Handbook 775 (5th ed. 2010).
Friday, March 9, 2012
EU Research Guide
Lexis Practice Tools Class
- Monday, March 12 at Noon in Room 155
- Monday, March 12 at 5:00pm in Room 125
- Tuesday, March 13 at Noon in Room 155
Thursday, March 8, 2012
Spring Break Hours
The Library will be open 8am-6pm Saturday, March 17th through Saturday, March 24th. Regular Library hours resume on Sunday, March 25th from 8am-midnight.
- Closed Saturday, March 17th - Sunday, March 18th
- 9am - 5pm on Monday, March 19th - Friday, March 23rd
- Closed Saturday, March 24th - Sunday, March 25th
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Uniform Electronic Legal Material Act
Established in 1892, the ULC meets to review and draft statutes for areas of U.S. law that they feel should be consistent or uniform across the states. This model legislation can then be adopted as is, or with modifications, by individual states. Uniform acts cover a range of topics including probate, foreign money judgements, anatomical gifts, child custody and trade secrets. One well-known uniform act is the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
The American Bar Association's House of Delegates (ABA) approved the UELMA at its February 2012 meeting in New Orleans. Legislation has been introduced in Colorado, California and Tennessee. The Colorado bill, HB 1209 was introduced January 30, 2012 and assigned to the Judiciary committee.
For more information on the UELMA, including a Legislative fact sheet and an explanation of why states should adopt the act, see the ULA website.
Written by Patty Wellinger, Reference Services Coordinator
Monday, March 5, 2012
Writing Tip of the Week: That, Which, and Who
The relative pronouns that, which, and who are used to join a dependent clause to the rest of the sentence. They “relate” the clause back to a noun.
- The house that the defendant lived in was on Mulberry Street. (clause relates or refers back to the noun “house”)
If the clause relates to a person, use who. If the clause relates to a thing, use that if the clause is restrictive and which if the clause is nonrestrictive. “Restrictive” means that the clause restricts the meaning of the noun—it helps identify the noun. “Nonrestrictive” means that the clause does not restrict the meaning of the noun, but merely provides additional information about a noun that has already been fully identified.
Clauses beginning with which are nonrestrictive and should be set off with commas; that clauses are restrictive and should not be set off with commas. Who clauses can be restrictive or nonrestrictive.
- The driver who hit the green car was seriously injured. (clause refers to a person and is restrictive because it identifies the specific driver being referred to, so use who with no commas)
- The car that the police were chasing reached the intersection first. (clause refers to a thing and is restrictive because it identifies the specific car being referred to, so use that with no commas)
- The blue car, which entered the intersection after the accident, was not speeding. (clause refers to a thing and is nonrestrictive because it is not needed to understand which car is being referred to, so use which with commas)
Relative clauses that follow proper nouns are nonrestrictive; the reader understands what the noun is without the information in the clause.
- Justice O’Connor, who wrote the dissenting opinion, applied a novel analysis. (clause refers to a person who is completely identified by name, so it is nonrestrictive--use who with commas)
For more information, see Anne Enquist & Laurel Currie Oates, Just Writing 215-20, 311 (3d ed. 2009) and Laurel Currie Oates & Anne Enquist, The Legal Writing Handbook 656-58 (5th ed. 2010).